西花蓟马蛋白的提取及双向电泳体系的建立
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

基金项目:

国家自然科学基金项目(31201576);吉林省科技发展计划项目(20150309006NY、20160520035JH)


Protein extraction of Frankliniella occidentalis and establishment of two-dimensional electrophoresis system
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
    摘要:

    [目的]蛋白样品的制备是获得良好双向凝胶电泳(2-DE)图谱的前提,建立合理的西花蓟马蛋白的双向电泳体系,获得分辨率较高、重复性较好的图谱,能够为后续的研究提供有力支撑。[方法]实验以西花蓟马成虫为实验材料,对比了饱和酚法、TCA/丙酮法和直接裂解法3种蛋白提取方法,从中选出最适宜双向电泳分析的一种蛋白提取方法。[结果]3种方法蛋白提取率差异显著,直接裂解法蛋白提取率最高,饱和酚法的蛋白提取率最低;3种方法的SDS-PAGE条带数差异不明显;TCA/丙酮法的双向凝胶图谱效果最好,蛋白点最多。[结论]TCA/丙酮法能够有效去除西花蓟马蛋白中的干扰物质,是最适合西花蓟马双向凝胶电泳的蛋白提取方法,为后续西花蓟马在蛋白组学方面的研究奠定了基础。

    Abstract:

    [Aim] Protein sample preparation is the prerequisite to obtain an optimal two-dimensional electrophoresis (2-DE) gel map. Establishing a suitable 2-DE system can provide a strong support for the subsequent research.[Method] This study used Frankliniella occidentalis adults as experimental materials, and compared three protein extraction methods:Tris-phenol, TCA/acetone precipitation, and direct decomposition extraction. The most suitable method of 2-DE system was defined through the analysis of 2-DE protein images.[Result] Experimental results revealed that the three methods showed significant differences in protein extraction rate, among which the direct decomposition method was the highest while Tris-phenol method was the lowest. The three methods got similar SDS-PAGE results. TCA/acetone method had the best quality of 2-DE gel map, with the highest number of protein spots.[Conclusion] The results suggest that TCA/acetone method could remove interfering substance effectively and was optimal for protein extraction of F. Occidentalis. It laid foundation of further study on the proteomics of F. occidentalis.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

王金鑫,杨爽,张鑫鑫,张炬红,席景会,王军.西花蓟马蛋白的提取及双向电泳体系的建立[J].生物安全学报中文版,2017,26(4):280-284

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2017-06-21
  • 最后修改日期:2017-08-15
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2017-11-22
×
《生物安全学报》
近日,有作者反映收到假冒编辑邮件,请作者仔细甄别。