70%丙森锌可湿性粉剂对环境生物的安全性评价
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

基金项目:


Safety evaluation of propineb on environmental organisms
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
    摘要:

    【背景】丙森锌是一种广谱、速效、残效期长的保护性有机硫杀菌剂,广泛用于作物病害的防治,但是药剂的广泛使用也可能会对农田环境生物产生一定的影响。【方法】根据《化学农药环境安全评价试验准则》,采用多种室内模拟试验,测定了丙森锌对环境中6种非靶标生物鹌鹑、蜜蜂、家蚕、斑马鱼、大型溞和蚯蚓的毒性,并进行了环境安全性评价。【结果】70%丙森锌可湿性粉剂对鹌鹑、蜜蜂的毒性为低毒;对家蚕的96 h LC50为0.3990 mg·L-1,属剧毒;对斑马鱼96 h LC50为1.4764 mg·L-1,属中毒;对大型溞的48 h EC50为2.7406 mg·L-1,属中毒;对蚯蚓的14 d LC50为29.0737 mg·kg-1,为低毒。【结论与意义】该研究结果可为丙森锌的风险评估和环境安全管理提供依据,并为其合理使用提供基础资料和科学指导。

    Abstract:

    【Background】Propineb is an organic sulfur fungicide with protective broad spectrum but with long residual effect in soil. Being readily available, propineb is widely used for preventing plant diseases. It may have some negative effects on other organisms in the fields. 【Method】Toxicity of propineb on six untargeted species (Japanese quail, bee, silkworm, zebrafish, daphnia and earthworm) was tested by various indoor simulated tests, according to "Experimental Guideline for Environmental Safety Evaluation of Chemical Pesticides", and toxicity bioassay was also conducted. 【Result】The results showed that the toxicity of propineb to bird and bee was low. The LC50 (96 h) for silkworm was 0.3990 mg·L-1 and considered extremely toxic. The LC50 (96 h) for fish and the EC50 (48 h) for daphnia were considered medium in terms of toxicity with values of 1.4764 mg·L-1 and 2.7406 mg·L-1 respectively. and the LC50 (14 d) of propineb for earthworm was 29.0737 mg·kg-1, representing a low toxicity. 【Conclusion and significance】This study provides scientific evidence for risk assessment and environmental security management of propineb, and argument and scientific guidelines for its reasonable use.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

李建宇,史梦竹,傅建炜,游泳,林涛,郑丽祯,魏辉.70%丙森锌可湿性粉剂对环境生物的安全性评价[J].生物安全学报中文版,2014,23(1):46-50

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期:
×
《生物安全学报》
近日,有作者反映收到假冒编辑邮件,请作者仔细甄别。